(no subject)
Nov. 9th, 2007 07:45 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
...when Confucius, the most famous and revered East Asian teacher, was asked by his students to tell them the meaning of athoritative personhood or jen - the conceptual pivot of his entire philosophy - he refrained from ever giving them a a definition. In diametric opposition to the Platonic insistence on defining essences, Confucius related paradigmatic stories. Knowing what a word means is not knowing what it signifies, but how to conduct oneself in situations where it is used.Reinventing the Wheel: A Buddhist Response to the Information Age. By Peter D. Hershock .p. 6
see also Eleanor Rosch, http://psychology.berkeley.edu/faculty/profiles/erosch2007.pdf
no subject
Date: 2007-11-10 04:10 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-11-10 04:14 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-11-10 04:18 am (UTC)-----
this is very important - an increasing number of choices tends to overburden the control system, so that it takes us back to the complexity of the starting point.
"ideality" = don't have to control anything.
no subject
Date: 2007-11-10 04:28 am (UTC)The premises of the argument for open possession of firearms is a classic instance of such a reduction blindness: "Guns don't kill, people do. p. 20
Pistols and televisions are tools. Tools are extensions of our body-mind. They are designed and manufactured in order to extend our natural capacity.
no subject
Date: 2007-11-10 04:35 am (UTC)===
looks like he's proposing another control mechanism. one could argue that market is a community driven decision body, though an imperfect one.
no subject
Date: 2007-11-10 04:37 am (UTC)===
control points of the third order. dictating the pace of change within an eco-system.
no subject
Date: 2007-11-10 04:43 am (UTC)==
again, talking about a control point within a system evolution pattern.
no subject
Date: 2007-11-10 05:04 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-11-10 05:20 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-11-10 06:59 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-11-10 07:02 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-11-10 08:29 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-11-10 08:29 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-11-10 08:39 am (UTC)This changes as sophisticated tools and their associated technologies come into play. Building technologies lead to a specialization of labor, to a separation of tool making and tool using, a disjunction of designing and constructing. Technologies of control individuate effort.
=== this is where and when the money technology emerges
no subject
Date: 2007-11-10 08:39 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-11-10 08:40 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-11-10 08:57 am (UTC)==
cf "The world is flat". for a aprice.
no subject
Date: 2007-11-10 06:33 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-11-10 08:17 pm (UTC)..
Corporate structure - as a technology - allows tremendous amounts of energy to be gathered and channeled at will.
... the evolution of corporate structure can be seen as entailing othe one hand a centralization of highly informed decision-making and on the other an intense diversification of both products and markets. Information transfer and analysis technologies are the primary means of insuring the former. Multinational corporations are clearly unthinkable in a world limited to postal transmissions of information, hard currency, and card-file dtabases.
no subject
Date: 2007-11-10 08:20 pm (UTC)...
Rational production means not only mass produced end commodities, but the commodification of basic material resources as well. p.63
no subject
Date: 2007-11-10 08:24 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-11-10 08:28 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-11-10 08:34 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-11-10 08:42 pm (UTC)..In short, we are not part of that family's story and they in turn are not truly part of ours.
no subject
Date: 2007-11-11 05:02 am (UTC)At the same time, resisting our own habitual modes of perception is to stop taking a stand on whether things are good or bad or indifferent and to recognize our irrevocable intimacy with all things. Freeing things from our habitual views of them is free ourselves from these very same views - a liberation from the win barbs of 'me' and 'not-me', 'self' and 'other'.
...it also enables us to realize that no situation is intractable, that no barrier is absolute. p. 106
It means consciously making an effort to sense things from different perspectives and on different scales. p. 107
no subject
Date: 2007-11-11 05:11 am (UTC)The world in which we live should be seen as a narration - a meaningfully ordered pattern of interrelationship - structure by our own values and intentions. p.110-11
no subject
Date: 2007-11-11 05:29 am (UTC)In sharp contrast, the ideal Buddhist person - the bodhisattva or 'enlightening being' = is said to have an unlimited capacity for skill-in-means. Such a person is able to improvise with any situation to orient it (with a minimum expenditure of forece or energy) away from the samsaric toward the nirvanic - away from blockage, stalemate, rigidity, and strstion toward freedom, harmony, flexibility and joy.
=== see Zajonc experiments on the arousal-complexity diagram.
=== also relates "how do we find people who think outside of the box in NE 175 lecture 6".
no subject
Date: 2007-11-11 08:11 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-11-11 08:55 am (UTC)==== cf tunnel vision.
no subject
Date: 2007-11-11 09:03 am (UTC).. the idea that a parallel can be established between the underlying principle of addiction and that of technological progress is intellectually and mythically repugnant. p 120
== the insatiable desire for control
no subject
Date: 2007-11-11 09:34 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-11-11 09:37 pm (UTC)===
has to go to go together with release techniques, e.g. meditation, yoga, and etc.
no subject
Date: 2007-11-11 09:56 pm (UTC)That is, Buddhist technology is concerned less with measurable results than with shared meaning and purpose.
p. 132
no subject
Date: 2007-11-11 10:06 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-11-11 10:07 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-11-11 10:18 pm (UTC)===
perception tools define the level of understanding. "hearing" vs "vision", "expression language".
no subject
Date: 2007-11-11 10:24 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-11-11 10:25 pm (UTC)== cf. early adopters, early majority, etc.
no subject
Date: 2007-11-11 10:27 pm (UTC)== also kinds of wants, i.e. if a want is a payload, then who controls the flow of our wants?
no subject
Date: 2007-11-11 10:34 pm (UTC)..
One of the reasons fads are so profitable for the corporate world is that they produce remarkably intense singularities of wanting throughout a population - curvatures of social and economic space that greatly accelerate the flow of wealth and thus afford significanly increased "handling" ability for those in a position to direct the resulting current. p. 143
===
cf. transition in control points: from a cool product to the control of the pace of system evolution.
cf. political "technologies". cool idea - movement.
disruption -> disequilibrium.
technology disequilibrium - cf S-curve.
no subject
Date: 2007-11-11 10:49 pm (UTC)==
a good metaphor for Google's business model.
also, knowing our social graphs allows advertisers create the mere presence effect.
no subject
Date: 2007-11-11 10:51 pm (UTC)